Alternatives to Prison in Dealing with Offenders

Alternatives to Prison in Dealing with Offenders treasure the preferences to prison in dealing with offendersWe live in a nightspot that is screaming for help. When it comes to a medical illness that a doctor disregard cure, he is allowed to go through great lengths to provide the best armorial bearing possible. The same applies to the government who relies on the prison system to maintain honor of nature and order in dealing with offenders in order to live in a peaceful society. The idea for the social occasion of a prison as a whole is to rehabilitate and, in most cases, restructure the agency of living so that, when turf outd, a soulfulness is better off in society than behind bars. However, there be several alternatives to prison that merchantman be considered according to the offensive activity pluckted.A well known alternative to prison is the system of fines. Fines are known as m unmatchabletary bureau imposed upon a convicted offender which contribute vary a ccording to where the annoyance was committed and the gravity of the discourtesy. Offences which warrant a fine are separate according to the level of seriousness the to a greater extent serious offence evidently refers to a higher fine. This method is normally apply for small offences committed. Fines are non considered appropriate for murder, impair, serious drug offences, aggravated robberies, and major re-offences by both member state. Any offence carrying a maximum prison condemnation of at least three years in Croatia, any intentional violent curse in Moldova, and any war crime conviction in Bosnia Herzegovina can non be dealt with by a fine.(2010) However, this method did non prove to be quite effective since it concludes that if people could afford the fine, the penalisement would not be effective, and where people could not pay the fine, it was likely that their family would scram the financial consequences.Pre trial appreciation is the time period that an of fender is incarcerated surrounded by being arrested and his trial.Detentionis only supposed to be used so as to ensure that the person get out not pose a hazard to other people. It undermines the play of a fair trial and the rule of law in a number of ways. People in pre-trial detention are particularly likely to suffer violence and abuse. With erupt the protection of law, and isolated from their family, it is delicate to withstand such pressure. High rates of pre-trial detention are likewise contributing to prison overcrowding, poor prison conditions and growing the risk of torture. Pre-trial detention has a hugely damaging impact on defendants, their families and communities. Even if a person is acquitted and released, they whitethorn still turn in lost their root word and job. They face the stigma of having been in prison when they return to the union. Unfortunately, in many an(prenominal) countries pre-trial detention continues to be imposed systematically on those sus pected of a brutal offence without considering whether or not it is necessary, or whether less interfering measures could be utilize.A good alternative to prison is teaching method as it has the potential to be a major driver of rehabilitation. At best, it opens pris acers minds to in the raw possibilities and ways of understanding that can give them a way out of the cycle of reoffending. It can also cod positive effects elsewhere, for practice by raising prisoners skills so that they are more likely to be able to access a stable job afterwards release, which in itself will help with reintegration. Considered more broadly, courses that encourage prisoners to think in a different light about family and other personal relationships may superstar to better communication within families and a more positive, stable base environment. Education helps one broaden his mind and also helps a person to think more positively.Due to an advancing technological world, a modern way of dea ling with offenders has been found. The use of electronic monitoring was first applied in a criminal justice case in England and Wales in 1989, when a man was granted bail on condition that he voluntarily agreed to have a device attached to him (Lilly and Himan, 19931)119 The use of electronic monitoring is becoming increasingly widespread and is now used to monitor over 10,000 offenders in atomic number 63 on any given up day. Where it has been established, electronic monitoring of a curfew has become an ever-more important part of criminal justice systems and is used at various stages of criminal cases as a condition of granting bail in the beginning trial as a sentence in its own right and as a condition of earliest release from prison. When an offender is monitored electronically, a tracking device is fitted to their ankle and a monitoring unit is positioned in the persons house or other place of curfew. Currently, the equipment is based on radio frequency engine room where t he tag acts as a transmitter. The tag sends signals to the monitoring unit which in turn send signals to a fake centre. Dick Whitfield stated that one common thread that can be observed within Europe is that the growth of EM has been very largely politically driven(2007) much more than most criminal justice developments.( It means it is also politically more vulnerable, too. This method is mostly used for small offences this also helps to control prisons in a better way since many small offenders can stay at home with this device. It is also safe since the offender will not be able to move a long standoffishness due to this electronic tag.A good prison policy aiming at the social reintegration of prisoners is an important factor when considering the social life of an offender after imprisonment. Even though the purpose of a prison sentence is to punish offenders and put them where they can do no harm, art object preparing them for subsequent release and reintegration into societ y, , imprisonment does not achieve the second objective as a large number of former prisoners reoffend within five years of their release. on that point are many causes for this, including socialisation to prison culture, lack of family support, lack of education and vocational training and social prejudices. Spending many years in prison may be a factor in de-socialisation as it very often destroys prisoners ties with their families, friends and the rest of society. The chances of successful social reintegration also regard on the nature of the offence committed and the sentence served. In this connection, the speculation of alternatives to imprisonment for petty offenders might be social integration.Community serve well has proved to be an effective solution while dealing with offenders. resolve can sentence defendants to perform unpaid community work called community service to repay a debt to society for having committed the offense. The defendant may be required to perform community service in attachment to receiving some other form of punishment, such as probation, a fine, or restitution. In 1992, Zimbabwe introduced Community Service(2004). Very quickly this alternative proved itself to be more humane, less expensive and a more efficient receipt to crime. An example of community service would be Someone convicted of persistently move litter may be sentenced to pick up litter, or a convicted drunk driver may be required to appear before school groups to explain why drink driving is a crime and an ethical breach. This in fact makes the offender realise that whatever offence he committed was wrong. Therefore this method psychologically helps the offender to be a responsible citizen instead of ruining his life by passing game to jail.Death penalty can be considered as an option while dealing with offenders. This form of punishment has in fact been banned in many countries due to the beliefs of each of them, for example, a country might have religi ous beliefs about taking the life of someone as something wrong. However, it is not always the case since the offender must have done something which is not humane to deserve this form of punishment. If someone may allow himself to rape/kill/murder another person, then why should he be allowed to stay alive? This form of punishment has been a debatable one over years yet many do not turn over in it. Death penalty should actually be applicable to offenders who commit serious offences who would instead have a lifetime imprisonment as punishment. This would also increase the economic budget of a society which would have to spend unnecessary money on such offenders this money could instead be used to stiffen poverty.We certainly cannot have a special(prenominal) alternative to prison in dealing with offenders, but we can certainly choose the best punishment according to the offence committed. This would help to reduce the number of criminals in our society since many of the offenders stand a chance of being re-integrated in the society instead of becoming a worsened person by going to jail.References1. Loffmann.M, Morten.F. (2010)Investigating Alternatives to Imprisonment.online The Quaker Council for European Affairs. arse of publication Europe. Available from-http//www.qcea.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/rprt-alternatives-en-jan-2010.pdf2. Whitfield Dick, Electronic Monitoring Ethics, Politics and Practice, keynote presentation 10 May 2007 in the Netherlands on-line, accessed 10 December 2007, available at http//www.cepprobation.org/uploaded_files/pres EM 07 whitfield.pdf3. PRI(2004) Alternatives to imprisonment, Pre-trial justice, Prison conditions, Rehabilitation and reintegrationonline . Available from http//www.penalreform.org/resource/community-service-africa-alternative-imprisonment/