Evolution Is :: Science Biology Essays

maturation IsHas the narrative of Mayr and his fellow naturaliststhose phylogenyists who include natural filling in their explanations and who comprise a strong majority of evolutionist voices today instantly entered a sort of evolutionary stasis? Not yet.For example, consider Mayrs central possible action of speciation as it applies to a creative species such as humans. There ar heathenish and creative aspects of our so-called higher level species that have the capableness to distract whether and how recent species taxa might evolve from military man sapiens mobility and its tack together on isolation, technology applied to environmental and physiological conditions, artificial constraints on reproduction, affable cultures, and our creative abilities. Whether our species is forecastter equipped to survive or more(prenominal) likely to accelerate towards extinction may, in part, be determined by these factors and their interactions. Evolution is. Therefore, we are. The human species is an infinitesimally improbable out-come of countless, unrepeatable iterations of a transition that itself is a fluke. To reiterate the late naturalist Stephen J. Gould, erase the tape, have one worker transmit a few feet to the left for good measure, do a retake, do a trillion trillion retakes, and nothing akin to homo sapiens is likely to emerge. Evolution is not intuitive, nor would any sane gambler bet on its odds. There are no proofs, no conclusions base upon experimentation and testing. What we know about evolution derives from historical narrativethe evolutionary biologists reconstruction of what might have happened. Their scenario has also evolved through iterations of accumulating, adapting, and eliminating ideas according to wise findings, new observations, and new knowledge. In the process, the narratives woof and warp have tightened. Gaps contract to the stratum that, in What Evolution Is, biologist Ernst Mayr could proclaim, Evolution is not a nd an idea, a theory, or a concept, but is the name of a process in nature, the occurrence of which can be documented by mountains of yard that nobody has been able to refute...It is now actually misleading to refer to evolution as a theory, considering the massive evidence that has been discovered over the farthermost cxl years documenting its existence. Evolution is no longer a theory, it is obviously a fact Mayr 275. Central to this simple fact is the concept of speciation, which was positive in the 1930s by Dobzhansky and Mayr. According to them, allopatric speciation is contingent upon the spacial and laic integrity of a population, a species taxon.Evolution Is Science biology EssaysEvolution IsHas the narrative of Mayr and his fellow naturaliststhose evolutionists who include natural selection in their explanations and who comprise a strong majority of evolutionist voices todaynow entered a sort of evolutionary stasis? Not yet.For example, consider Mayrs central the ory of speciation as it applies to a creative species such as humans. There are cultural and creative aspects of our so-called higher level species that have the potential to perturb whether and how new species taxa might evolve from homo sapiens mobility and its effect on isolation, technology applied to environmental and physiological conditions, artificial constraints on reproduction, social cultures, and our creative abilities. Whether our species is better equipped to survive or more likely to accelerate towards extinction may, in part, be determined by these factors and their interactions. Evolution is. Therefore, we are. The human species is an infinitesimally improbable out-come of countless, unrepeatable iterations of a process that itself is a fluke. To paraphrase the late naturalist Stephen J. Gould, erase the tape, have one player move a few feet to the left for good measure, do a retake, do a trillion trillion retakes, and nothing akin to homo sapiens is likely to emerg e. Evolution is not intuitive, nor would any sane gambler bet on its odds. There are no proofs, no conclusions based upon experimentation and testing. What we know about evolution derives from historical narrativethe evolutionary biologists reconstruction of what might have happened. Their scenario has also evolved through iterations of accumulating, adapting, and eliminating ideas according to new findings, new observations, and new knowledge. In the process, the narratives woof and warp have tightened. Gaps narrowed to the point that, in What Evolution Is, biologist Ernst Mayr could proclaim, Evolution is not merely an idea, a theory, or a concept, but is the name of a process in nature, the occurrence of which can be documented by mountains of evidence that nobody has been able to refute...It is now actually misleading to refer to evolution as a theory, considering the massive evidence that has been discovered over the last 140 years documenting its existence. Evolution is no lon ger a theory, it is simply a fact Mayr 275. Central to this simple fact is the concept of speciation, which was developed in the 1930s by Dobzhansky and Mayr. According to them, allopatric speciation is contingent upon the spatial and temporal integrity of a population, a species taxon.